Corpus
Evidence quality starts before the model.
AskStein's orthopedic corpus is acquired, classified, filtered, and converted into traceable evidence units before it is ever used to compose an answer.
- Acquired
- 17,700 orthopedic papers acquired and classified
- Retained
- 16,400 papers retained at a relevance score of 0.7 or higher
- Training set
- Approximately 12,000 verified question-and-answer pairs targeted
- Specialty
- Orthopedic clinical decision support (the current beachhead)
- Embeddings
- OpenAI text-embedding-3-large
- Index
- FAISS, built for fast similarity search
- Traceability
- Answers link back to the supporting paper span and PMID
The pipeline is designed as a closed evidence loop: acquire literature, process it into traceable units, use verified question-and-answer pairs to improve the response layer, and publish only answers whose supporting evidence can be resolved to a source.
AskStein's central bet — confirmed empirically in its own testing — is that retrieval quality, not model size or fine-tuning, is the dominant driver of answer accuracy. Improving the corpus and the retrieval pipeline moves the needle more than swapping in a bigger model. Anyone can call an LLM; the defensible asset is the curated body of evidence and the standards that keep it clean.
See how the corpus is actually used at query time in the documentation →
The orthopedic corpus is the first vertical. The next phase is designed to ingest PubMed at scale — more than 40 million abstracts, with full text included where it is openly licensed — and extend the same evidence and abstention discipline across specialties.
Every answer should lead back to the exact evidence that supports it.